Who Interprets Scripture?

When seeking truth, an important question naturally arises: Where does spiritual authority come from? Is it found in Scripture itself, or in the interpretations provided by a particular group? This isn’t a challenge to anyone’s sincerity — it’s simply the kind of question every believer is encouraged to consider.

Many religious traditions teach that Scripture cannot be understood without an authorized interpreter. When that happens, the focus can shift from the Bible to the organization that explains it. That shift may be subtle, but it matters, because it affects how a person evaluates truth.

This question is not meant to be confrontational — it is foundational.

If Scripture is clear and sufficient, then its message stands on its own. But if an organization’s interpretations are placed on the same level as Scripture, it becomes difficult to separate what the Bible says from how the organization explains it.

Throughout history, sincere people have wrestled with this tension. Some beliefs stay close to Scripture; others extend beyond it into tradition, reasoning, or organizational structure. Not all of these extensions are harmful — many can be helpful or practical. The key is recognizing the difference between what Scripture teaches and what a group may add for clarity or guidance.

That is why returning to Scripture itself is so important. The Bible provides a stable reference point — a “square” that does not shift. Like a grid square on a map, it helps us stay oriented. If our navigation drifts even slightly, we may feel confident while still moving off course.

The longer someone spends in Scripture, the clearer its message becomes. But when anything — whether tradition, emotion, or organizational teaching — rises to the same level as Scripture, it becomes harder to distinguish God’s Word from human interpretation.

The principle is simple:

• Teachings that fit fully within Scripture can be embraced with confidence.

• Teachings that extend beyond Scripture should be examined carefully.

• Practices outside Scripture can still be meaningful, as long as they do not claim Scriptural authority.

This is not about criticizing any group. It is about encouraging every person to let Scripture speak for itself — to let the Bible be the standard by which all teachings are measured.

The question remains gentle but important:

Does Scripture guide the organization — or does the organization guide how Scripture must be understood?