Where Does Authority Reside?
Authority determines certainty
Authority determines certainty
Scripture claims to be God’s word—breathed out by Him and sufficient.
Some systems teach that Scripture requires an equal, external authority to define its meaning.
This raises an important question: Does God’s word stand complete—or does it require supplementation?
When seeking truth, an important question naturally arises: Where does spiritual authority ultimately come from? Is it found in Scripture itself, or in Scripture as interpreted through an external authority? This is not a challenge to anyone’s devotion or sincerity — it is simply the kind of question every believer is encouraged to consider.
Throughout church history, many traditions have taught that Scripture cannot be fully understood without an authorized interpreter. When that happens, the focus can shift from the Bible to the institution that explains it. That shift may be subtle, but it matters, because it shapes how a person evaluates truth.
This question is not meant to be confrontational — it is foundational.
If Scripture is clear, God‑breathed, and sufficient, then its message stands on its own. But if an institution’s interpretations are placed on the same level as Scripture, it becomes difficult to distinguish what the Bible teaches from how the institution explains it.
Sincere believers across centuries have wrestled with this tension. Some teachings remain close to Scripture; others extend beyond it into tradition, reasoning, or ecclesiastical authority. Many of these traditions can be helpful or meaningful. The key is recognizing the difference between what Scripture teaches and what a group may add for clarity or practice.
This is why returning to Scripture itself is so important. The Bible provides a stable reference point — a “square” that does not shift. Like a grid square on a map, it helps us stay oriented. If our navigation drifts even slightly, we may feel confident while still moving off course.
The longer someone spends in Scripture, the clearer its message becomes. But when anything — whether tradition, emotion, or institutional teaching — rises to the same level as Scripture, it becomes harder to distinguish God’s Word from human interpretation.
The principle is simple:
Teachings that fit fully within Scripture can be embraced with confidence.
Teachings that extend beyond Scripture should be examined carefully.
Practices outside Scripture can still be meaningful, as long as they do not claim Scriptural authority.
This is not about criticizing any group. It is about encouraging every person to let Scripture speak for itself — to let the Bible be the standard by which all teachings are measured.
The question remains gentle but important:
Does Scripture stand complete as God’s Word — or does it require supplementation from an external authority to be understood?